Corsair ram has had so many problems, so little gain in performance for so much more money that it's not worth it. Q and I often joke about ram being "almost as bad as corsair" when the company fucks up somethin' big with their RAM products. (like OCZ's hike in prices). 1T is marginal, at best, over 2T.
Intel might have the CPU war won RIGHT NOW, and yes that applies to this spec set, but
I'd rather support the innovation to come, the same that has been proven in the past. The same principal applies to ATI.
Lastly for my hole-poking I'll note the monitor. When is too big too big? When it's uncomfortable to look at. Anything over a 19" Widescreen (and I've played on a 21" widescreen before) is too big for me.
Bang/buck is pretty great for my purposes.
BTW: I do loads of video work and multi-tasking (in it's true sense). I like to compile shit on one core, encode a video on another, etc. The dual-processes change a lot but the fact remains my dual-core gets used. Remember, I use my PC for more than XP and games. My foremost OS is Linux which doesn't have the petty problems XP/Vista have. In addition, my stuff usually runs better on Linux (I'm not getting into details here because fact is fact, I prefer Linux and wether or not XXXXX task can be done on Win-DOHs or not is totally irrelevant, I use Linux.)
I will give you that ATI is more of a bitch under Linux. I'm hoping that will change and will be helping to make that happen. Yes, I actually *do* contribute to the open source community as I can.
Hope this makes more sense.
Innovation over benchmarks,
Future over present,
AMD/ATI/Linux over Intel/nVidia/m$.
Has nothing to do with fanboyism. I love them for their reasons and my uses. It works out best like this so I exploit that.